Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (756 Views)

June 14, 2016 02:52PM
Bob,

Of course but track speed is highly relevant with pace or whole figs. Very little current data is available on 12f pace figs and simply because of the distance, jocks are most likely putting the brakes on early.Saturdays raw surface was plus+ many lengths.

Pace figs at 12f rarely pass a smell test as jockey intent is not quantifiable.This Belmont's pace was more to the honest/slower side in my notes.The whole race I deem common,the winner still a slug.

Mike
Subject Author Posted

Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1309 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 09:02PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (914 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 09:16PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (937 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 09:39PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (888 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 09:47PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (832 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 10:10PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (772 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 10:15PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (769 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 10:30PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (808 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 10:31PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (877 Views)

miff June 13, 2016 10:37PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (763 Views)

RICH June 14, 2016 09:07AM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1005 Views)

miff June 13, 2016 09:48PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (934 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 10:21PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (841 Views)

jimbo66 June 13, 2016 10:36PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (766 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 11:16PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (836 Views)

jimbo66 June 13, 2016 11:23PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (829 Views)

bobphilo June 13, 2016 11:55PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (839 Views)

jimbo66 June 14, 2016 12:28AM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (914 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 12:58PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (816 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 01:01PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (770 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 01:20PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (794 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 01:51PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (786 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 02:40PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (837 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 02:50PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (836 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 03:03PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (879 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 03:45PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (799 Views)

jimbo66 June 14, 2016 03:53PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (696 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 04:39PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (764 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 04:59PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (735 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 05:20PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (772 Views)

Rich Curtis June 14, 2016 05:34PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (804 Views)

TGJB June 14, 2016 05:43PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (666 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 09:35PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (827 Views)

TGJB June 14, 2016 10:26PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (690 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 05:25PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (729 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 02:29PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (756 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 02:52PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (741 Views)

jp702006 June 13, 2016 11:34PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (753 Views)

jimbo66 June 13, 2016 11:38PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (867 Views)

jimbo66 June 13, 2016 10:22PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (891 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 10:38PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (818 Views)

jimbo66 June 13, 2016 10:45PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (893 Views)

sekrah June 13, 2016 11:36PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (572 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 05:20PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (753 Views)

miff June 14, 2016 05:30PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (697 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 06:28PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (744 Views)

Tavasco June 14, 2016 06:30PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (752 Views)

TGJB June 14, 2016 06:35PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (717 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 06:38PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (759 Views)

TGJB June 14, 2016 06:44PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (650 Views)

richiebee June 14, 2016 06:57PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (706 Views)

sekrah June 14, 2016 08:54PM

Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (706 Views)

bobphilo June 14, 2016 09:25PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login