Different TG users can analyze a race and come up with totally different selections. Two examples from yesterday. Vic on the TPGS seminar loved the turf sprint winner, Steve Byk on his website didn’t have the horse in his top 4. In the BE/Preakness double, Byk had 3 A selections and 2 B’s, none of them the winner.
I’m not picking on Steve as I am a fan of his. Just trying to show that two very experienced TG users came come up with totally different selections on the same race. Which is always why I personally use the sheets in handicapping a race and if I get the analysis, it is more as a “double check†on my handicapping.
