Yes, I’m telling you a guy who trains lots of horses does not know everything a vet does, especially when the vet thinks it’s something innocuous. From what has come out and not been disputed, 1- the vet recorded the use of the cream at that time, 2- tests show it was not an injectable.
And again— this was not a legit performance enhancer. You seriously think the guy would risk getting DQ’d (forget all the rest of this), for an innocuous drug, that he had a positive test with in the Oaks last year? Which is more likely, that or a screwup?
