Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Saarland report (1028 Views)

May 06, 2002 04:25PM
Bobe chip excuse seems like clutching at straws. He ran poorly partly because they all came out of the gate walking (and I mean walking, I still can't believe it when I watch it again on tape) and yet he was 10 lengths behind after half a furlong. I knew it was over then. I like Johnny V. but that seemed like having a plan and not being flexible enough to adapt it to the circumstances. Still, he showed no sign that he would have won in different circumstances on the day (though he did close, which many others didn't). I think that if I had backed Medaglia I would be cursing Frankel for what seemed like a change in tactics. But the winner looked great - I just wish we could have found out if he was so good that he could win when properly challenged. I had big prices on both saarland (20/1)and perfect drift (25/1) and went in with a big smile knowing I had won the pre-race future stakes - unfortunately I got my ass kicked in the race and that's all that matters.
Subject Author Posted

Saarland report (1730 Views)

kevin s May 06, 2002 05:53AM

Re: Saarland report (1065 Views)

Mark O'Keeffe May 06, 2002 01:31PM

Re: Saarland report (977 Views)

HP May 06, 2002 03:02PM

Re: Saarland report (1044 Views)

Treadhead May 06, 2002 03:47PM

Re: Saarland report (1052 Views)

HP May 06, 2002 03:59PM

Re: Saarland report (1028 Views)

fastspeed May 06, 2002 04:25PM

Re: Saarland report (1131 Views)

kevin s May 06, 2002 04:32PM

Re: Saarland report (1023 Views)

teekay May 06, 2002 04:52PM

Re: Saarland report (1020 Views)

kevin s May 06, 2002 05:17PM

Re: Saarland report (964 Views)

teekay May 06, 2002 05:28PM

Re: Saarland report (974 Views)

kevin s May 06, 2002 05:40PM

Re: Saarland report (1068 Views)

teekay May 06, 2002 05:12PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login