Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: On the contrary (608 Views)

July 10, 2006 10:29PM
JohnTChance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Two points regarding this are made in Steve
> Crist's new book, EXOTIC BETTING.
>
> 1. A superfecta that pays $48,000 for $1 will be
> reduced by $12,000 in federal withholding. However
> a dime superfecta that returns $4,800 for 10 cents
> will NOT be subject to withholding because it
> falls below the $5,000 threshold. For this reason,
> superfecta players should consider making their
> bets in dime increments wherever possible. Ask
> your favorite teller to "repeat." "Repeat that 10
> times, please."

Steven Crist is giving VERY bad advice. This is similar to someone trying to deposit more than $10,000 cash in a bank by coming in Monday through Friday and depositing $2,000 each day... it doesn't work. The Treasury Department is very interested in why you have $10k cash just like the IRS will see that you have multiple tickets bought to specifically avoid the "at the window" withholding. Here's the law, right from the IRS website:

Identical Wagers
Winnings from identical wagers (for example, two $2 bets on a particular horse to win the same race) are added together for purposes of the reporting and withholding requirements. Also, winnings from identical wagers that are not part of the payment for which the Form W-2G is being prepared are added together for purposes of withholding to determine if the total amount of proceeds from identical wagers is more than $5,000.


I personally know someone who was dumb enough not to report a $2k winner and was subsequently audited and fined. It's not worth the money you're trying to save. Take your winnings and be happy.

Subject Author Posted

ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (979 Views)

1st time lasix July 10, 2006 04:23PM

Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (665 Views)

high roller July 10, 2006 04:51PM

On the contrary (736 Views)

1st time lasix July 10, 2006 05:01PM

Re: On the contrary (673 Views)

JohnTChance July 10, 2006 08:35PM

Re: On the contrary (649 Views)

Michael D. July 10, 2006 08:45PM

Re: On the contrary (628 Views)

JohnTChance July 10, 2006 08:59PM

Re: On the contrary (691 Views)

Michael D. July 10, 2006 10:01PM

Re: On the contrary (627 Views)

JohnTChance July 10, 2006 10:24PM

Re: On the contrary (599 Views)

NoCarolinaTony July 11, 2006 01:19AM

Re: On the contrary (608 Views)

ezgoer89 July 10, 2006 10:29PM

Re: On the contrary (596 Views)

NoCarolinaTony July 11, 2006 01:52AM

Re: On the contrary (631 Views)

Boscar Obarra July 11, 2006 02:23AM

Re: On the contrary (552 Views)

JohnTChance July 11, 2006 02:06PM

Re: On the contrary (572 Views)

ezgoer89 July 11, 2006 02:43PM

Re: On the contrary (512 Views)

Michael D. July 11, 2006 02:59PM

Re: On the contrary (539 Views)

colin July 11, 2006 03:46PM

Re: Exotic Betting (644 Views)

BitPlayer July 12, 2006 12:16PM

Re: Exotic Betting (617 Views)

JohnTChance July 12, 2006 05:27PM

Re: Exotic Betting (572 Views)

MO July 13, 2006 02:44AM

Re: Exotic Betting (565 Views)

richiebee July 13, 2006 08:01AM

Re: Exotic Betting (532 Views)

JohnTChance July 13, 2006 02:07PM

Re: Exotic Betting (625 Views)

NoCarolinaTony July 14, 2006 03:19AM

Re: Exotic Betting (541 Views)

Chuckles_the_Clown2 July 13, 2006 10:23AM

Re: Exotic Betting (512 Views)

BitPlayer July 17, 2006 03:09PM

Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (561 Views)

affirmedny July 13, 2006 01:29PM

Re: ten cent supers and 50 cent trifectas (476 Views)

Boscar Obarra July 19, 2006 04:28AM

Re: t10 cent supers and 50 cent tris (519 Views)

1st time lasix July 19, 2006 01:57PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login