Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Synthetics (513 Views)

April 15, 2008 08:04PM
Guys,
Determining which horses will or won't move up on surface changes is not as big a mystery as you think. Without insulting anyone's intelligence, distances, race types, surfaces all change, but the one thing that never changes is a horse's pedigree. I think many handicappers have had it handed to them on the Poly, Cushion, Pro Ride and Tapeta because of a variety of reasons, but the #1 reason is simply "assuming" certain high profile sires will throw good runners on any type surface. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Let me profile some "high profile" sires with some statistics and then you can draw your own conclusions.

Honour and Glory on Cushion at Santa Anita (Oak Tree) meet 1 for 10;
Cee's Tizzy 0 for 20; Tribal Rule 0 for 18.
At Hollywood, Devil His Due 0 for 14; Touch Gold 1 for 24; Menifee 1 for 21;
On Poly, Deputy Minister 9 for 127; Unreal Zeal 2 for 74.
On Cushion only, Cryptoclearance 0 for 19; Devil His Due (repeater) 0 for 17; Dixieland Band 0 for 15; Menifee (repeater) 1 for 21; Real Quiet 0 for 16; Touch Gold (repeater) 1 for 28.

Let me illustrate one sire in particular. Relaunch. He has son's like Cee's Tizzy, Honour and Glory, Skywalker, Bertrando and Bright Launch. Most of this group are well respected, in most cases, guys are gonna assume they can run a little based on their pedigree. The grandsons of Relaunch (Tiznow, Put It Back, Officer) are terrific Poly running producers. They stink on Cushion.
The sons of Relaunch are very good at Cushion, and the grandsons of Relaunch are especially good at producing Poly runners.
Generally, you will find that mares out of Bertrando and Skywalker are excellent on all artificial surfaces, but especially on Cushion.
For those who are unwilling to recognize the differences, it's gonna be impossible for them to ever get a "handle" on how a horse "might" run first time on a different artificial surface.
As I indicated earlier, most of the high profile sires are gonna eat your lunch when you are playing them on the assumption they produce a runner on all artificial surfaces.
Then you come to the Tapeta surface. Now, in my opinion, this one is pretty easy to figure because, with all due respect, your having to outrun horses at the Tapeta track on the east and Golden Gate on the west, without question, a lesser quality group of animals than you're going to see at Keeneland or Arlington or Southern California.
There are a handful of spectacular sires for the Tapeta surface, but I'd rather not disclose who they are in an open forum or my advantage takes a huge hit.
I would be willing to disclose a couple of them to Mr. Brown, if he were willing to consider my suggestion regarding artificials.
I decided a couple years ago rather than to try to fight this unknown monster, i.e. artificial surfaces, I would dedicate 12 hours a day for several months and really get a handle on it. At this point, I'm very confident in which horses are subject to liking the surfaces. Yet, as we all know, the advantage of a particular pedigree goes out the window without the proper intent of the connections. A well-bred Poly horse may not have any talent, and that's out of our control.
Please, please understand that Cushion, Tapeta and Pro Ride are "similar" in the types sires that produce those type runners. Polytrack is a completely different surface from any other type. Comparing Polytrack to the other artificial surfaces is like trying to compare regular dirt to turf, there is little resemblance, although, there are many horses that can crossover and have success. There will always be exceptions, as horseplayers, we all accept that premise. There is no assurance a horse moving from Cushion to Tapeta will run better, or vise versa. There is no assurance a horse moving from Cushion will run good on Poly. It is ALL in the pedigree.
Sorry for the long post. I'll be happy to elaborate further, if there's interest.
Subject Author Posted

Synthetics (979 Views)

TGJB April 15, 2008 06:16PM

Re: Synthetics (567 Views)

covelj70 April 15, 2008 06:32PM

Re: Synthetics (513 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 08:04PM

Re: Synthetics (471 Views)

miff April 15, 2008 08:29PM

Re: Synthetics (475 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 08:35PM

Re: Synthetics (453 Views)

miff April 15, 2008 08:46PM

Re: Synthetics (466 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 08:53PM

Re: Synthetics (423 Views)

miff April 15, 2008 09:00PM

Re: Synthetics (561 Views)

alm April 15, 2008 08:34PM

Re: Synthetics (585 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 08:50PM

Re: Synthetics (475 Views)

Michael D. April 15, 2008 08:46PM

Re: Synthetics (471 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 09:00PM

Re: Synthetics (550 Views)

TGJB April 15, 2008 09:00PM

Re: Synthetics (427 Views)

smalltimer April 15, 2008 09:13PM

Re: Synthetics (446 Views)

miff April 15, 2008 08:14PM

Re: Synthetics (430 Views)

belveondarockz April 15, 2008 08:32PM

Re: Synthetics (466 Views)

BitPlayer April 15, 2008 09:22PM

Re: Synthetics (569 Views) Attachments

TGJB April 15, 2008 09:49PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (464 Views)

BitPlayer April 16, 2008 06:36PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (490 Views)

TGJB April 16, 2008 06:46PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (449 Views)

miff April 16, 2008 07:15PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (498 Views)

TGJB April 16, 2008 07:43PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (423 Views)

miff April 16, 2008 08:38PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (491 Views)

TGJB April 16, 2008 09:12PM

Re: Ground Loss for Blue Grass Figs (435 Views)

miff April 16, 2008 09:15PM

Re: Synthetics (493 Views)

fkach April 15, 2008 09:50PM

Re: Synthetics - How much is "way up"? (445 Views)

BitPlayer April 17, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Synthetics - How much is "way up"? (522 Views)

TGJB April 17, 2008 05:08PM

Re: Jump-Up Sizes for Spring 3yos (441 Views)

BitPlayer April 17, 2008 08:33PM

Jimbo's Question (566 Views)

TGJB April 20, 2008 07:03PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login