"I should approach the foreigners in this race by simply throwing them out as non of them, nada one has preformed well in this race."
I wouldn't have touched Mubtaahij either to have anything to do with the payoffs in the Kentucky Derby but really that's my, albeit, small issue here: according to the figs he DID perform well, just about a length poorer than his race in Dubai.
I know of course that what he beat over there wasn't an impressive bunch, all though I think you may be underrating them a bit, after all the purse was as big as the one in the Kentucky Derby and they aren't giving away that kind of money for free, are they?
Anyway, for a moment take away the entire field in the Kentucky Derby and let Mubtaahij run it one more time doing exactly what he did on saturday, is it really likely that his race was as good as the one he did in Dubai? Maybe it is, I'm not sure. Just giving my humble opinion that I do find that just a tad doubtful, but if noone else has issues with it I'm guessing that the issue here is me, and that I'm okay with.
EDIT (COMMENT): (it could of course be more likely that if you for a minute assume that I would be the one that is correct, it is actually the figure from Dubai that is the problem (too slow), and not the one from the Kentucky Derby).