I'm a guy who buys the seminar every year. Honestly, IF Rags had a track history of being equal or superior on the big days, I would not let another
$ 15.00 - 25.00 stop me from buying both. I'm assuming anyone who plays horses year around is planning on spending a larger portion of their bankroll than they would on a typical Saturday, so that little extra money is a small price to pay if it yields something significant.
I say keep putting out a highly successful seminar, don't HIDE the numbers or who you feel will run well and not run well. If a competing product wants to crow about something, let them crow about their results. Isn't that how a competitive business works?
Why don't you consider asking the guys on a scale of 1-10 how good they think the seminar was in terms of content, in terms of selecting high placement horses, and who felt they were helped or not helped by having paid for it.
If that happens, invite the competitors to survey their customers.
Both entities took a hit on Upstart, no advantage either way on that horse. I don't know, I'm guessing they like Carpe Diem a bit, and no one can hold Materiality's start as a poor horse to select.How did the other 17 horses do compared to the seminar analysis?
For the overall content, the paying attention and pointing out stats, things to consider in the seminar, that is always top notch methodology by JB.
I'm giving the survey a solid 8 out of 10 and I don't even think a 9 of 10 or 10 of 10 is possible unless Upstart wins that race at 20/1 and Carpe lands somewhere on the board.
Sorry to ramble.
