If it's not your place to defend Nebel, then don't. I said he was banned, you said he wasn't, Jerry said he was and now you say it's a 'mischaracterization' and 'incorrect.'
He was banned. Apparently the actions of the track's management mean nothing to you, and this doesn't reflect on Nebel or his employers. Whatever.
As for Ragozin's policy, are companies responsible for the actions of their employees or not? I think, to some extent, they are. There's plenty of law on the subject.
I guess I don't blame them for not talking about Nebel being banned. Companies are not usually in the habit of talking about their problems unless they are compelled to do so. I for one am not particularly inspired by dead silence in response to significant accusations, or companies that continue to employ people who can't seem to do their job without being thrown out of their place of business. But hey, whatever floats your boat.
If that's the 'high road', you can have it. Good luck. HP
