sek,
I'm gonna renege one time about being finished with responding.
2014-13-12-11-10-09-08=07=06=05 That is the 10 year period I used, I could not have been more clear. You insist on including Smarty who ran in 2004. My initial sheet SPECIFICALLY says the last 10 Derby's. I didn't include Seattle Slew either.
I already explain Brother Derek more than once. I don't care if he paired his negative, has NOTHING to do with this sample. NOTHING. He's in the #4 spot where he belongs in this sample.
I wasn't apologizing to you. I was apologizing to TGJB and everybody else in the room.
You are bringing up points with no merit sek. Please do a 10 year sample study on something and we will see if this old forensic accountant can offer suggestions.
sek. I don't engage in "systems." I am a methodologist. I never referred to it as a "system" I never inferred it would work, because it is still incomplete. If it "falls apart in future years" it will have been a fun project to do. You think this is the first time I started with a random sample and found nothing useful? I do stuff like this because its fun.
That's all sek. Put something that consists of 10 years of data together, cause I'd love to discuss its merits with you.
